"The wise man does at once what the fool does finally."
-Niccolo Machiavelli
One thing I really do not understand about Singaporean youth is that they value something overly highly-- individualism. I do, too, sometimes. But it has gotten to a point where the pioneers of new ideas have moved on, while blind followers are still caught up in trying so hard to be different that they end up being all the same. Simply put it, it's pseudo-individuality.
I could be guilty of it too, maybe we all are, in one way or another, or at least at one point in our lives. I have a very good example that illustrates my point-- Indie music.
Indie; or 'independent' music, refers to musicians who are void of being 'tainted' or influenced by any particular record label/company. In that sense, Indie musicians apparently produce music considered to be less commercial and not as mainstream as many artistes under record companies are. True that, and although I must confess I am definitely not a connoisseur when it comes to music, I do realise that many Singaporean youth are beginning to listen more to Indie music just because.
Why, I ask. Is there something wrong with commercial music; Coldplay, Keane, even ,well, Britney Spears (for the love of god I do not like her, this is' just for the sake of using an example of a typical pop-princess type of thing)? Is it that important that one listens to something that not everybody else is listening to on the radio? Does it make you more special that you are listening to Indie music? Je ne comprends pas! I do not understand this, at all.
But well, before I have Indie music fans shoot me down for criticising their music choices and tastes, let me first disclaim that I have no qualms or jurisdiction over what songs anybody wants to listen to. Sure there are people who really love Indie music because, well, I don't know, but surely there are undoubtedly many out there who are Indie fans just for the sake of being Indie fans, no? Disagree?
This blog post is, however, not one that seeks to rant on issues that revolve around music. More importantly, I want to draw references to the politically apathetic youth in Singapore. Just as many are drawn to Indie music for whatever reason, I have no idea why the Singaporean youth are so bent on putting down the PAP. They complain that they are oppressive, put down democracy, and do not allow freedom of speech. Basically everyone claims that they are a watchdog government that is almost omni-present and that you can never escape from the clutches of the government!
While I can't deny that Singapore is not exactly being run under the basis of true-blue American freedom-fighting-esque democracy, we are in essence and in theory, a Republic. In addition to this, we can only decide on our leaders for the GRCs in various constituencies and henceforth indirectly decide the ruling party, and from there a Prime Minister is being elected into office by the ruling party. Our Westminster system is not one that really allows for us to have direct contact and communication with the leader of our nation, unlike say the States where their Presidential System allows for a more direct contact with the President in terms of voices being heard. Presidential candidates put in effort to garner support from the peoples because of the very fact that their competition is strong. There isn't any walkover, there isn't any sure-win, people are undecided on who they should vote for because they genuinely support ideals that the candidates push through, i.e. ending the Iraq war, or continuing stem cell research, legalising homosexual marriages etc.
I implore you, then, to think: is our opposition strong enough, even, to rally against the PAP? Sure there are exceptions; there is WP's Low Thia Kiang who's managed to win over Hougang, and SDP's Chiam See Tong (whom I deeply respect; but whose health is obviously ailing) who are undeniably talented and intelligent individuals. But pray tell me, is the PAP not doing a good job in their respective GRCs? Do we not get the lift-upgrading, or the 'study/chess corners', or the well-built & clean bus stops and shelters that we need? We do. Is Singapore society so largely unfair and divided in wealth that we see homeless people everywhere on the streets? No. Do we not get our right to education (even if we do, some people take it for granted)? Absolutely not.
Moreover, it is not only the Singapore government that practices strict censorship laws in terms of media outlets and press freedom. MDA does have strict laws but they have definitely tried to go around it by imposing the M18/NC16 rule. As for press freedom, I do know that Singapore is used in many academic examples as being one of the strictest in the world but there are other countries who are becoming increasingly oppressive. Think about it-- at least we don't have something like the Great firewall of China. Yes, there are several websites that are banned in Singapore but hey at least you are able to access your facebook, Twitter, and Youtube account.
So what's with these youth trying to advocate democracy just for the sake of it? Well, I am definitely not undermining the value of democracy, it is also an ideology that I agree with. But ask yourself a few questions:
1. How should democracy be achieved in a system like Singapore's? Is there a way that we can speak up to our Prime Minister and vote for a PM directly? No. Our political system does not allow this. And our system is definitely not warped or unfair, the United Kingdom practices the Westminster system as well.
2. If you are truly an advocate for democracy and you are extremely pent up and frustrated about the lack of a voice here in Singapore, why aren't you doing anything about it? Do you really want to make a difference so much that you complain that the PAP is not doing its job proper? Why not do something about it rather than whine all day?
I'm definitely not trying to promote the PAP, yes I do know that every party has its flaws but I believe largely that the ruling party is doing a good job in the country. I may not agree on its policies sometimes (that being rising COE prices that are insanely exorbitant) but what I do not agree more on is how the youth today are constantly putting down the PAP when they are doing nothing about it. Is it because everyone is doing so? Has the PAP left you jaded and skeptical and resentful over their oppressiveness? I doubt so, but if they are, why don't you make a difference today?
-
perhaps there are youth out there who are really trying, so maybe credit should be given to them for that. could be in terms of volunteerism, etc.
ReplyDeleteHi Sam,
ReplyDeleteYes I understand your point.. but one must note that not all youth volunteerism is always altruistic. Could be for the 'hero' mentality; etc. But anyways, more so, I'm wondering about youth's participation in matters that involve the state, more legislative/regulatory issues rather than civil society stuff. Yup. :)
many Singaporeans dislike the pap for obvious reasons, they just don't say it.
ReplyDeleteYes I do not deny that many are disgruntled, whatever reasons they may be, but whats the point of being disgruntled YET not doing anything about it? Thats what I'm driving at.
ReplyDeleteAlso, personally I feel that sticking with the PAP trumps voting for a weak opposition any day.
i agree that the opposition is far too weak...but in that case there should be a better environment facilitated for free speech in order to encourage a stronger opposition. A stronger opposition=increased effort by the PAP to win over the people=even better policies that work for the people
ReplyDeletei agree with you, amelia. most singaporean youth are apathetic when it comes to politics and this could be due to our socialisation. most do not even have an opinion about the political environment in singapore; in fact, i believe there are few who even knows anything about the environment, much less take an interest in it. hence, in my opinion, i dont see any motivation behind what they protest against- it's more for the sake of it, it seems!
ReplyDeleteHello Wenjia. Haha.
ReplyDeleteWell perhaps we should give credit to those out there who try their best to get involved. What X said is true. There probably has to be a better environment for the opposition to speak up before they can be strong enough.
Education minister Ng Eng Hen did say a couple of weeks ago that he is heartened to see that many increasingly educated youth are voicing their opinions and it gives light to a stronger opposition that encourages competition which could possibly increase the PAP's efficiency and competitiveness to connect with the masses.
In addition to this, our opposition is far too divided and not concentrated enough to be strong against the PAP. Chee Soon Juan and Chiam See Tong have had long standing feuds for ages that weaken and even ridicule the whole idea of an opposition in Singapore.
Agreed. The truth is, for a lot of young people I know, I highly suspect being expressive about one's dislike for the PAP has become the... well, the indie thing to do (to borrow your music analogy). This has a lot to do with the fact that most of them simply gripe, and do nothing about what they complain about. Which really goes to show just how little they actually care.
ReplyDeleteHaving said that, I still love my indie music, just as much as I enjoy listening to Coldplay. My point is, its absolutely possible to find balance and have variation. Things don't have to be black and white, one doesn't have to want democracy, and therefore hate the PAP. You can disagree with some of their policies, and still say you respect the PAP. I don't know why people feel you must be completely dead set against something, in order to show support for another.
Article on ST Online came out today at quite an apt time after my blog post:
ReplyDeleteAye to Constitution changes
By Jeremy Au Yong
The House voted 74 to one in favour of the amendments to the Constitution that would increase the maximum number of Non-Constituency MPs from six to nine and entrench the Nominated MP system. -- ST PHOTO: NEO XIAOBIN
PARLIAMENT on Monday passed laws ensuring at least 18 people not from the ruling party will enter Parliament after the next election.
The House voted 74 to one in favour of the amendments to the Constitution that would increase the maximum number of Non-Constituency MPs from six to nine and entrench the Nominated MP system.
The three-hour-long debate included a prolonged exchange between Home Affairs Minister Wong Kan Seng, who presented the Bill, and the two Workers' Party parliamentarians Low Thia Khiang and Sylvia Lim.
The debate focused mainly on the move to increase the number of NCMPs, something both WP members opposed in principle.
Separately, three Nominated MPs, Mr Calvin Cheng, Assoc Prof Paulin Straughan and Ms Audrey Wong also spoke passionately to justify their existence in the House.
The passage of the Bill marks just one part of the move to effect the political changes announced by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong last May. On Tuesday, Parliament is set to debate the rest of the rule changes to the Parliamentary Elections Acts and the Presidential Elections Act.
http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_519442.html
HELLO WOMAN!
ReplyDeleteAs much as i agree with you that majority of the youth in Singapore only know how to complain about the government without doing anything about it, let me then ask you, how many u suggest that they put their words into action? While it is easy for one to criticise them, it is difficult to find a solution to what ure criticising them for.
let me illustrate from my personal example: As much as i highly disagree with the way the state runs our education system and how i feel that it is increasingly demanding (such that it gives priority only to the best of the lot and it simply leaves those who cant catch up behind), i feel largely helpless with my undergrad status in being able to do anything to change that.
simply because who the hell is going to pay attention to a 22 year old undergrad who want to push for changes to the education system? for one, people may just regard me as a jaded product of the education system.
two, i dont have any kids, i dont have proof that the education system is demanding.
three, i have no power to influence. i am no minister's nor big time CEO's daughter. My only way to influence is to get my master's and to get a job that has influential power over MOE. in the meantime, i can really do much. but thats not going to stop my critical feelings towards the education system.
so, as much as i agree that people need to stop complaining and do something about it, there really arent many means that the government makes available to do influence and champion changes. moreover, we all know our watchdog government insideout. and it is unwise to do anything that the PAP is going to despise, cos that's going to cost u ur whole future and we all dont want to be the next chee soon juan, do we?
Isabel,
ReplyDeleteI would first like to say that I find your criticisms on the Singapore Education system very socialist-esque -- I believe egalitarianism through education will never work; and hence I believe very much that the PAP has used very well the concept of meritocracy (you do well, you get rewarded) in education. While I can't deny that Singapore's education is getting increasingly demanding and competitive, it only brings about a more highly educated and competitive generation who possess adequate knowledge that will help to up the value of human capital that we have. In that sense, it is better for the society at large.
And although I have to agree with you with regards to youths having little or no power to speak up and voice their grievances; there are VERY little youth out there who are, say, like you or like several others that I know.
Basically, what I mean is: if you want to complain, complain with a BASIS. Don't complain for the sake of complaining, especially when you know nuts.
Yep. That's about it.